Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus RANA TALIB HUSSAIN

Appeals against the principles of section 417 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), sections 419, 420, 468, 471 and 109 of the eviction rule, the trial court's decision to dismiss the verdict and the evidence on the contents of the record Has been the result of misrepresentation of. Investigation and sent to trial, what element did the Epic Dickshot of the police have presented against them, even though it was not binding on the court, the court could get other facts from the same trial. It was clear. From the record where the trial court wrote the wrong parentage of the complainant's defense evidence during the trial, there was no relevance to the turning point, and this is a tactic that the upper courts have generally dismissed. Avoided interfering with decisions, but where there was unread or misrepresentation. Evidence on the record was evident that it was the duty of the court to do full justice. rt Because the reasons given by the trial court for the conduct of the accused were speculative and artificial, the conclusions filed by the trial court were not based on any evidence and the findings of the accused's innocence. In addition to misreading the conclusions, the evidence has to be misread. Examine the quality, not the quantity of evidence, nor in the present case was sufficient material to guarantee the record of the accused, and to forge charges of forgery through forgery, and fraudulent possession of property. Delivery was proved to be a crime. False documents have earned their income as fake documents us immigration advocates from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer