Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ AHMAD versus STATE

The testimony of Section 2 (b (b)) was an exaggerated history tampered with by the statement of the prosecution witness recorded by the police, in which witnesses established their presence at the scene of the incident to fit the story of the prosecution. The relevant time statements of the witnesses were recorded by the police only four days or one month and four days later, but during this period they did not inform the complainant nor the police The eyewitnesses had to do this immediately if they really saw that the incident against the accused was very suspicious and He was acquitted property advocate from Bahawalnagar lawyer