Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAFEEZ versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN

Article 199 Constitutional Application The admission of an educational institution in the MC Telecommunication Petitioner had applied for admission to the MSc Telecommunication at the University and submitted the required amount within the stipulated time, but the admission form was rejected on the basis of this. It was reported that the request was not submitted through the submission report. This amount was acknowledged by the University, in fact, was submitted by the applicant within the stipulated time, but the deposit invoice or its copy was not included with the admission form and consequently the applicant, I was on the merit list, his form was rejected and the prospectus was submitted the next time the waiter was shown, the document was listed with the form, but the invoice or a copy of it Was not included, except that receipt of the documents submitted by the applicant was issued and no acknowledgment Was not needed. It was not the bank where the deposit was on the university campus and it was not difficult to confirm the facts of the deposit for the university unless otherwise there was a clear requirement mentioned in the profits. To include a copy of the challan with the effect of the form, though admission was also entitled according to the merit list prepared by the University. The boy was admitted, it was for the University to provide the applicant with a seat for which he was qualified by his standards, in which case the applicant should not be held guilty, especially when he admitted. The amount required attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sohawa District Daska lawyer