Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LTD. versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, KARACHI

Section 194B (2) and 196 of the High Court's scope of error correction, which asked whether the amendment request was a post-amendment request or an amendment request, is evident from the record seeking error correction, The petition was requested to amend the order passed by the Tribunal and there was no prayer that there was some error in the record that could be corrected which, in fact, the finding given by the Tribunal was, in fact, a tribunal. There was an attempt to modify the order. The petition and any such jurisdiction was not granted to the tribunal, so the application was not applicable, was not open to any exception, every question of law was not to be admitted by the High Court point for hearing in this case as That's in the present case. Along with the High Courts, the Court found that various decisions of the Supreme Court did not yet require a new finding on the issue of what was the scope of the error. Not on the record family advocate from Bisham lawyer