MST. KAUSAR versus STATE
Section 498 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 (2) and 16 bail prior to arrest, approval of the accused's appearance, which the accused woman was in advanced family status, by the State Also not seriously denied was the lawyer or complainant statement about the other female accused that she was a consenting adulterant with the co-accused, but at the same time agreed that she should marry. The case is pending adjournment against the complainant, and it was seriously charged by the complainant that the complainant had abducted her and she was sued by him. Aditi was subjected to the circumstance, it seemed that the accused was a daughter and mother and their detention would not benefit the prosecution, especially when the accused had alleged that the complainant was against the Internet. The person claiming to be the husband of the accused will not be contacted during the trial of the married marriage. IM bail was already given to the accused, the circumstances were confirmed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer