Find a Lawyer

SALEEM AKRAM versus STATE

In section 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 379/411 pre-arrest bail, the accused's grant alleges that there was some dispute between the parties regarding the tractor that his grandfather had purchased from the complainant suit. Was. The suspect's grandparents, who were chased and the complainant agreed to pay some cash for the return of the tractor along with his allegedly stolen rotewaters, demanded the rest of the money, as the current false case counter blast. Was filed in which the dispute raised by the accused in connection with the civil suit and the parties was supported by the documents on record, in the earlier case it was proved that the parties had a dispute. Was. A copy of the contract was also offered over the same tractor, with the defendant registering a lawsuit, stating that the background could be the result of Malala's misfortune to avoid paying the rest of her grandfather's father for a tractor. Even though the complainant's part was impacted by the recovery of the allegedly stolen Rootwater, otherwise, sending a lockup to the accused would serve no better purpose for the prosecution. The case deserved bail before his arrest; the interim bail had already been granted pakistani advocates Skardu lawyer