Find a Lawyer

TAHIR WAHEED versus STATE

In the Challan case, the cross-version writing of the previous statements and a complaint about the murder, in sections 324/353/34 of the Law in Seclusion (10 of 1984), Articles 540, 161 and 162 of Article 4040 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898) Of the persons who were under trial in the trial court, during the judicial examination of the witnesses, a question arose as to whether they could not be confronted with their earlier statements under section 161. Washed away, including all witnesses, including policemen. Section 404040, the right of the complainant to the testimony of the CCPC could be defined so that the witness was summoned and examined under section 404040, CRPC, to defeat the other provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Re-inspected. The role of the prosecution or the defense witness and if he is not referred to the prosecution's witness or the defense witness, that court's testimony would be simple, the prosecution's testimony under Section 54040 was abandoned, therefore, the PC CCP could uphold the decision regarding the trial at trial, if it could withstand the police statement under section 626262. tax advocates from Machi Goth lawyer