Find a Lawyer

IQBAL AHMED versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Sections 8 and 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Petitioner's claim that the transfer of the property was transferred to them because they had purchased it at a public auction and PTD The property in question was issued under the control and control of the Deputy Administrator Evacuee Trust Properties since 19460, and the Divisional Evacuee Trust Committee of the Evacuee Property Trust Board joined with it in the Official Gazette on 15 7 1963. Had objected to the object of behavior. He said that the property was invited as eviction trust property, but the applicants did not object to Clause (b) of Committee 10 (1) of Section 10 (1) of the Disclosure Trust Property (Management and Disposal) Act, 1975. Was only allowed to validate the transfer of property through it. The PTD issued a specific date before June 1968, if such verification was made against the certified claim, while the applicants claimed they had purchased the property in question at an open auction. And not contrary to the satisfaction of their certified claim, the provisions of section 10 (1) (b) of the Disclosure Trust Property (Management and Disposal) Act, 1975, which do not apply to the transaction in question. Otherwise, applicants were allowed to go for more than a quarter of a century (27 years) after publishing property in a PTD grant and gazette, but they were able to collect rent from their occupants. No attempt was made for the permanent transfer deadline so that the fake document applicants failed to prove their claim in relation to the property under consideration. registration advocate from Harnai lawyer