Find a Lawyer

FALAK SHER versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

R6 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Departmental Proceedings The appeal to appeal to the Supreme Court after the effect of the criminal court was canceled, failure to provide any justification for the delay While on duty, the two offenders escaped from custody in a court proceeding, while the civil servant was essentially retired, while the service tribunal partially allowed appeal and mandatory retirement penalties ranging from one year to approved service. Changed when he was picked up by a government employee, when he was acquitted by a criminal court, Should the unconditional resignation be resigned unconditionally by the court, there was no significant impact on the commencement of the disciplinary proceedings, and no penalties could be exchanged which resulted in no negotiation and conciliatory proceedings. According to the rules of the Punjab Police (Talent and Discipline) rules were heard. , 1975, and there was no injustice with the CI, but the plea of the guardianship was imposed on 166 days and no justifiable justification could be made on the basis of such. Delays can be condoned, which were completed by the service tribunal in accordance with the law and the values of justice. The Supreme Court ruled out the appeal, not to guarantee any interference. r \ n famous supreme court advocate from Mir Ali lawyer