Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SHAH MUHAMMAD versus ATTA MUHAMMAD


Sections 12 and 42 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) declare a declaration on the basis of an agreement under the plaintiff to sell a consolidated search of facts, based on the trial court's agreement to sell it. Claimed to be the owner of Trial when the Lower Appellate Court and the High Court affirmed the trial court's decree and order affirming that the High Court correctly observed in the judgment that the contract for sale was not due to lack of title document Cannot form the basis of acceptance of the declaration under. The plaintiff's Special Relief Act, 1877, could not substantiate the simultaneous discovery of the facts recorded by the three courts on a single legal offer which could not be discounted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Malakand lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.