Find a Lawyer

DR. ABDUL SATTAR RAJPAR versus SYED NOOR MUHAMMAD SHAH

Section 22 and (99 (1) Election Petitioner) alleged that the applicant / failing candidate was under 25 years of age at the time of submission of the nomination form, so the returning candidate was not eligible to contest the elections. The bachelor's degree from which he was awarded was not affiliated with the University Grants Commission of Pakistan. Pre-polls and post-polls were held on the occasion of the returning candidate and that the elections were unfair and law-abiding. There were violations, etc. - Birth certificate issued by MetroPolitan Corporation and head in relation to your secondary school By submitting the Tafket, the valid Returning Candidate Examination, at the time of submission of the nomination papers, confirmed that she was over 25 years old, no evidence was presented to the contrary by the applicant and by the returning candidate. There was no reason to doubt the fact of the certificate prepared, in which case it was eligible that the candidate participating in the election had admitted in his cross-examination that he had not presented any evidence in this regard that the University of Iqra. Retired Candidate who received a Bachelor's Degree, was not affiliated with the University Grants Commission The candidate submitted a copy of the Accra University Ordinance (VI) 2000) under which it was stated that the University in which the HH was established said that the candidate who retired from the University had also prepared a copy of the list containing the University / Degree. The awarding bodies were shown and the name of Akra University was published in serial number 7 of the private sector. University / Degree Awarding Institutions have proof of this registration advocate from Bunner lawyer