MANAGING DIRECTOR, OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. versus SYED NAJMUL HASSAN NAQVI
Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), VII, R11 Premature Appeal Filing an appeal before the expiration of the ninth day was mandatory Retirement sentence, a public servant must be set aside, but the service tribunal allowed the appeal And set it apart. The penalty imposed by the officials was that the public servant filed an appeal the same day after the filing of the department representation, thus the appeal was premature, dismissed by the correctness of the service tribunal, In the preliminary phase, due to a serious mistake, timely withdrawal of the appeal from time to time during the appeal period and the cause of action was sustained and the appeal was dismissed on the ground that the initial offer was premature, if service. Such a face cannot be verified if taken by a tribunal. Under no justice principles premature affairs were bad but only premature and it was necessary to return the failure to return the appeal dismissed the tribunal from the court, thereby endangering the rights of public servants. And the Service Tribunal's first claims were already required to return an appeal, if no such restriction was made, then the Tribunal could not harm the civil servant on the basis of premature appeal. The service tribunal was matured only on the occasion of its approval; the service tribunal had earlier refused to dismiss the appeal on the score. The appeal was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Dandot lawyer