Find a Lawyer

SHAMSUDDIN versus THE STATE

Section ((b) Criminal Code of Conduct (vs. )9) 8), the inspection of the report of the chemical analyst alleged in connection with the allegedly recovered marijuana from Section evidence22 accused was positive, but such report in his statement before the accused. Was not inserted Section 2342, despite the CRPC, the defendant was convicted on the basis of the alleged retaliation of the Charlotte State's lawyer, who has admitted that the evidence of the chemical analysis report of the trial was filed under Section 2 342, CRPC. The accused has been subjected to material misconduct by not putting the required accused under it and said that the unlawful treatment could not be taken and the sentence imposed on the accused by the trial court was set aside and the trial court remanded the case. Under Section 2, 2, CRPC, the accused's statement was recorded and the case decided according to law. ask a advocate free from Landi Kotal lawyer