PROTEIN AND FATS INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus CAPITAL ASSETS LEASING CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER
Section 22 (1) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XLI, R 3 High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Volume V, Chip 1, R 4 Delay 2 Appeal Colonization 1 The / 2 year decree was passed on 3 2001 12 2001, the appeal was filed on 26 1 2002, which was re-filed on 29 1 2002, after the return by the office, but the office had earlier on that date. The object raised was to remove the raised object. Under section 5 of the Limitation Act 1908, the objection raised by the appellant in the petition was filed on 30 10 2004 after he was not notified by the office and on 23 10 2004 when he was removed from office. When contacted, they were told that the matter was an objection, on which the lie was delayed and the petition was granted for relief. The fate of the case was not inquired if the office did not inform the appellant about the objection raised by him. The matter, nevertheless, was excessively negligent as it waited more than 2 1/2 years through the office records for which the appellant's return was not detected, as in 23 1 2004. Such petition states that no cause for delay was offered, the High Court dismissed such request, consequently the appeal was dismissed due to time constraints.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Makran lawyer