Find a Lawyer

MST. RAHAM BIBI versus AZMAT HAYAT KHATTAK, ADVOCATE

The complaint against the lawyer against Sections 41, 42 and 43, before the Tribunal complainant, who was the respondent / accused advocate's real mother, had alleged that he had attached her as a lawyer in his public case. Had acted in his favor, but said that the lawyer subsequently challenged the plaintiff's allegation of fake and fraudulent charges in his complaint alleging that the defendant was his lawyer, through the court. Cannot challenge the decree passed in favor of which the defendant appeared to his lawyer and in doing so the plaintiff's advocate submitted Violated the canons of professional conduct, advocates for lawyers prayed for stringent legal action against the advocate parties, and members of the Bar Council's Dispensary Committee said written arguments and data available on record and According to the complaint, the complaint has been adjourned against which the complainant had filed an appeal challenging the wiring of the lessee and was obtained by the respondent Advocate E Complainant in which he was a lawyer, with the confession of legal professionals and Contrary to the rules and regulations of professional ethics formulated under the provisions of the Bar Council Act 1973 The Zee, and Advocate received a very high position in society, and even the courts. Advocates are expected to maintain the dignity of the legal profession and will not betray them with a sacred trust. In the present case, the Advocate had shown extreme irresponsible and abusive behavior to his mother. Was a client advocate. After committing professional misconduct, he will be charged female advocates from Chaman lawyer