Find a Lawyer

SAIF ULLAH versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Bail, Further Investigation FIR's grant showed that the date, time and place of the alleged murder was not known, nor was the alleged incident unknown. The perpetrator can neither be identified nor the culprits identified. The final evidence was relied upon at the time of the FIR's registration, the recovery of a blood-stained knife from the suspect's possession and the extra-judicial confession allegedly presented to him by the prosecution's witnesses for their alleged murder. In the prosecution, the victim's brother is alleged to have seen the accused and others in the company of the deceased, after which the body of the deceased was recovered by the police. , Was not seen in the journal statement prepared by the post-mortem inspection report and investigation. The officer, Mutofi, apparently suffered only fireworks wounds, not recovering a blood-stained knife from the suspect's possession in the original litigation case. The accused was allegedly accused of extra-judicial confession about two months after the FIR was registered, after which the extra-judicial confessed that the victim had taken some intoxicating substance before he died, but When preliminary medical evidence was not shown in the body of the deceased's body, when the alleged murder was not disclosed, the evidence has valuable and clear value depending on the prosecution. In this case, the challan demanded further investigation, the completion of the investigation, how to become a advocate from Faisalabad lawyer