NAILA JUNAID versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Section 767676 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 209 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition filed for division against the applicant in the criminal case filed by the respondent in his written statement. Disagree with the charges. Her husband divorced the parties' mutual consent before her death; respondent withdrew her claim on the basis of the contents of the written statements, petitioner filed a petition in the trial court under section 476, CR PC. Was because he lied. The applicant's application was dismissed by the trial court on the basis of the statement and false claims made by the trial court as well as the appellate court petitioner filed a constitutional petition alleging that both the courts applied for it. Made a mistake by law to exclude and said that there was no order of exclusion. According to the law enacted by Superior Courts W, the Ordinance may be in section 767676, the CCP was used to confess to the crime and to hear the same case by the court which indicated that the court It is at the discretion of the court to prosecute the person making the wrong claim. The following case, both the courts denied discretion in favor of the applicants, in view of the fact that the constitutional application was not stable, the High Court had no jurisdiction to find its place instead of finding the Tribunal below. While exercising power under Article 199. Constitution
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Ghari Dupatta lawyer