MESSRS DARSON INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
The Ordinance of Section 34 Companies (LXVII of 1984), Sections 37 and 38 Companies were registered under the name of Principals Appellant Company, Messrs. Darson Industries (Pvt.), While the Respondent Company was registered under the name of Messrs. Darson (Pvt.). Was. ) The two companies were in different business The appellant company was named as the respondents after which the Tribunal of the Registered Company Law Administration Division observed the matter and decided that the two companies had unusual names in connection with the different trades. For no reason. The fraud and respondent company was directed to change its name from Messrs. Darson (Pvt) Ltd. to Messrs. Darson Securities (Pvt.) Ltd, which had been disclosed by the Hiditya High Court, and if the concern was recorded Was misleading and gave his impression. The Commonwealth of High Courts may disqualify such a company and prevent it from further misleading proceedings that may have certain names in the society where the courts are allowed to have the names of the common names in connection with the registration of a company. Where names were unusual, popular and unusual was a hard idea. The name Darson adopted was in the category of unusual names, so, even if used with any other trade, it could lead to someone deceiving the source and the respondents from the source from which they originated. And is a reflection of the formerly registered company Word Dar. Along with a Kashmiri caste but word son, he had made an unusual name, unlike Ali, Omar, etc. The possibility of cheating in Word Darson
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
