Find a Lawyer

APPEAL NO332 OF 2002, DECIDED ON 12TH AUGUST, 2003. versus APPEAL NO332 OF 2002, DECIDED ON 12TH AUGUST, 2003.

Sections 32 (2) and 156 (1) (14) of coronation evidence (10 of 1984), arts: 59 and 63 invalid statements, errors, etc. Refractory Berks PCT Titles 6902 1090, 6902 2090 and 6902 1010 Applicant Announces PCT Rating. 6902 1090 and 6902 2090 as \ refractory bricks of _ qualified for customs duty Q, such PCT classification was for refractory bricks temperature temperature capable of resisting more than 1600 C After receiving the report, two eminent factories / manufacturers and the Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (PCSIR) concluded that the imported refractory bricks were rated exactly 6902 1010 against the PCT. And are charged on customs duty @ 30 ? The appellant / importer intentionally invalidated the PCT rating of the imported goods. Against Heading Nos. 6902 1090 and 6902 2090, the customs duty with short pay was refused and the applicant was ordered to pay duty / tax on the associated taxes and also imposed a penalty equal to the cost of the goods. The Collector of the Central Excise and Sales Tax (Adjustment) relied on the information of the three organizations and more emphasis was placed on the Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (PCSIR) report. It has been stated that all types of imported bricks were temperature resistance above 1600 C collector (judiciary). Had misunderstood the report, which showed the actual freezing temperature (working temperature range) below 1600 C, in which the manufacturer's literature clearly proved that it was below the load. Pressure when you need a advocate from Barkhan lawyer