Find a Lawyer

CH. MUNEER HUSSAIN versus MST. WAZEERAN MAI ALIAS MST. WAZIR MAI

Articles 16 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Articles 12 and 42 of the Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 78 agreements to sell and declare beneficiaries of documents executed by ignorant / illiterate women The specific performance of the IPO has to be proven through compelling evidence; such women have to execute such documents and they have to further prove that such transactions and such documents were explained to the abusers. Seemingly unreadable women who had free advice at the relevant time are entitled to protection. The court should be very careful in recording the results of the law of the court when an agreement was executed by such women and it would not be sufficient to show that the document was read to the woman who supervised the parade but This needs to be further confirmed. She understands the nature and impact of this, where there was no evidence that the documents contained were processed or processed by a woman. He voluntarily withdrew and gave freelance advice to his close relatives at the time the document was implemented, and the contents of the document were read to him and the nature of the transaction was explained. Was on the beneficiaries of the document which he had failed to exclude in the present case, the beneficiaries of the document could not identify any evidence or non-recourse in the disputed decision of the High Court in which the woman had The document was processed. Call the unbelieving lady inheritance advocates near Nooriabad lawyer