AZIZ AHMAD versus THE STATE
The arrest of the accused before the Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 406 and 420, denied the accused's argument that he had already paid Rs 17 lakh to the complainant in two installments and the remaining amount was 1,17, In lieu of Rs. 000, he handed over the check to the complainant due to lack of funds in the account, he could not pay the complainant this amount. The complainant had submitted that the accused had issued checks worth Rs. 18 lakhs and Rs. 17,000, and not Rs. 1,17,000. The complainant has also shown a photostat copy of the said check. Which cannot be broken because the accused's account was inactive because the case for cancellation of the documents was filed 17 days after filing the FIR, no case for bail before arrest, application for bail was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Rangoo lawyer
