ATTA ULLAH versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER/D.J. SANGHAR
16 and 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The rejection of the applicant's nomination papers was rejected by the Returning Officer, but the next day, the Returning Officer withdrew his earlier order and rejected the applicant's nomination. Do it. According to the relevant Police (Section HO) report of Police (Section HO), because he was an active member of banned outfit Jaish Mohammad, he did not think that the police had a track record that the applicant was an active Is. The Senior Superintendent of Police of the banned organization, a member of the Special Branch, had clearly stated in his letter to the District Coordination Officer that the applicant was not of bad character and that there was no politically motivated issue. Applicant submitted his affidavit and affidavit of seven members of the relevant Union Council to show that he was not affiliated with a banned organization, including the nomination of applicant papers, was not merely rejected on the police's notice. Should be done Has been accepted and the applicant will be entitled to contest the election
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Noor kot lawyer