SHAH JAHAN versus THE STATE
The trial court had adopted the wrong view of the accused as to the validity of the evidence in section 227 of the Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), section 336/334/34. The court cannot change parts of the court without the opportunity for a hearing and without providing defense to the accused, as this would cause the defendant's trial at the trial to be legally invalid, to bring the culprit to trial and sentence. After providing the defendants with an opportunity to defend themselves on separate charges, the trial was adjourned to a trial court for proper adjudication.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Bhirya Road lawyer
