Find a Lawyer

MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MULTAN THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL versus MUHAMMAD LATIF

Sections 2 (XXX), 46, 47 (3) and 48 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O1 (B) and termination of 12 jobs as permanent employees. After the Assessment of Respondents was terminated by the Authority, they challenged their dismissal in the Complaint Request The Authority requested that the Respondents be declared Work Charge Employees, not employees and as such Has no secured or guaranteed rights that can be enforced through complaint requests. Permission was granted and ordered to be reinstated in service The authority challenged the Labor Court's order in the appeal to respondents on the building, malls, mats, carpenters, mason / ministries, Electronics and surveillance were installed in buildings, parks and roads. The Department Authority said roads, buildings and parks had been maintained regularly since respondents were being employed with the auto, Wright said there was nothing wrong with the findings filed by the Labor Court that he responded. Respondents respond to permanent employees, in the circumstances of being treated as regular employees because the appellant authority was instructed to complete the regular process within a regular period. lawer from fb area from Phool nagar lawyer