WATAN PARTY THROUGH PRESIDENT, LAHORE versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Arts 193, 199 and 270 (AA) Office of Judges (Judges) Order (Appointment of Chief Executive Order No. 1 / Constitutional Judges of 2000 Applying the Principle of Sanity to Four Judges in the High Court) was done. The principle of sanity was not adhered to, while hiding the appointments made by the government, it was done that the matter had already been settled by the Supreme Court in the earlier decisions and the applicant had to file the present petition. There was no concrete stand for this, a question about the law had already been decided. In view of the qualifications stated by the Supreme Court in the case reported by the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others, the principle of seniority in the present case Applicants were not weighted in controversy but in view of Articles 189 and 190 of the Constitution, the High Court refrained from adopting any doctrine which was contrary to the principle wn the Supreme Court Petition was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
