ABDUL GHAFFAR GHAFFERI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY S&GAD
Constitutional application of Arts 13 and 1991 entering into transgression in violation of Light Patwari Station Order, proceedings before various forums against Light Patwari began with double jeopardy. In a mutation violating the officer-approved order (Revenue), complainants initially filed a petition against the Senior Member Board of Revenue to initiate a court proceeding against the Revenue Field staff. Were involved in confirming the change in the presence of the steel order, Director General Anti The Corruption Establishment also raised the issue on the petition filed. The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) officials also launched an inquiry by some complainants that the prosecution against them before the various forums was a double risk, and that it was against them personally. There was a case of revenge. In light of the political pressure some appeals filed by the complainant were filed in violation of the Steel Order, the Revenue Registry was examining the conduct of the Revenue Field staff, while the Anti-Corruption Establishment. The staff is considering this from an angle of receiving illegal pleasure from the relevant revenue, while the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) was investigating the Revenue Field staff's involvement in corruption through various authorities from different angles. Deciding the matter will be helpful in bringing the truth to fruition, therefore, it will not In case the action taken by the various agencies to understand from different angles
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
