Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD LATIF versus ASSISTANT CHIEF OF AIR STAFF (PERSONNEL)

Section 4 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Decision to abolish delayed appeal Appeal Forcing two departmental appeals, the civil servant must be retired. Instead of appealing to the Department of Appeal and the Service Tribunal when it was fined, a preliminary Second Department appeal was filed before the Service Tribunal and an application was also filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Yes, the service tribunal dismissed. The reason for the ban on appeal by a public servant was that the service tribunal should not have dismissed the appeal at any point without explaining the merits of the matter. The date of communication of the order regarding the dismissal of the first appeal o Because of the delayed question, the reason for the conviction lies in the exclusive jurisdiction of the service tribunal and no interference can be made without the justification of the court in whose presence the court Azmi did not agree to the request made by the civil servant. The tribunal was able to reject the appeal based on the limitations granted by the service tribunal. famous lower court advocate from Hasilpur lawyer