Find a Lawyer

ENGLISH BISCUITS MANUFACTURERS (PVT.) LTD. versus MONOPOLY CONTROL AUTHORITY

The proceedings and inquiries initiated under Sections 11 and 14 (2) of Section 11 and 14 of the Monopoly and Compulsory Trade Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance, 1970, respectively, object to the terms and conditions of such discrimination. The action was subject to the satisfaction of the authority. Violation of Section 3 of this Ordinance and the need for action in the public interest The purpose of such an action was to examine the power of unlawful monopoly or unnecessarily binding commercial practices in the public interest. The public is largely interested in or through which their rights or responsibilities have been affected, but this does not mean that the interest of a particular person can be investigated in relation to his or her own motion or referring to the federal government. On a written complaint of not less than 25 persons, and in the public interest if the opinion is required after inquiry. The proceedings may commence proceedings under S. The action and inquiry of the Ordinance Express Action 11 has neither been nor determined in the Ordinance, but the latter was a step for the former. It was not meant to resolve complaints, but to be launched in the public interest. top civil advocates from Pasni lawyer