Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHID versus THE GENERAL MANAGER AND OTHERS

Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Increasing the penalty The Supreme Court was against the government employee for stealing from government stores for allegedly stealing medicines from a public store of Rs 85,703, the department investigated. Subsequently, the service tribunal imposed stolen drugs on government employees after recovering the price, the penalties imposed by the authorities were justified. The accuracy court observed that it is surprising that the authorities acknowledged the crime of a public servant and retained it in the job so that it could be repeated. His illegal activities in paying fines would not even keep an ordinary person of modest mind when he was found to be involved in theft, but corruption and the common complaint of collecting millions of people even one. There was also a longing for the bullet while the drugs were being stolen from public hospitals and shops, and the exception was misused by a civil servant to be treated by a public servant as a public property guardian. No justification for the softening shown by the department authority The food court was set by a departmental directive to impose penalties on government employees. Appeal leave denied best advocate from Bhakkar lawyer