MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
Articles 14 and 15 prohibit the practice of confiscating articles and non-binding articles as used in Article 14 of the Prohibition (Enforcement) Order, 1979, does not mean that the prohibition is imposed by Article 14. Things will be confiscated. Head) Order, 1979 is governed by Article 15. Such a seizure is not mechanical or automatic, but it can be ruled only if the person claiming the seized property cannot satisfactorily calculate its use by which the seizing authority There is satisfaction in crime. Must be based on objective review of events and the claimant claiming such property is in accordance with the principle of natural justice in the Audi ultimum pertimum doctrine under Article 15 of Prodigy, ie no one is condemned. No order to confiscate a vessel, cart or other vehicle which may be liable for confiscation The owner may pass without love or affection, claiming an opportunity to become a beard, and, if necessary, such property claims. After recording the evidence in support of
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Matiari lawyer