MST. KHURSHIDAH ALIAS RASHEEDA BEGUM versus THE STATE
Section 9 (c) definitions of evidence, all material details in the prosecution's testimony were identical and no contradiction could be identified by the accused so as to be serious in the prosecution case, however, considering the amount of prohibited opium. Keeping in mind, the accused woman was about 50 50/51 years old and in prison since her arrest in 2003, she deserved a relaxation in the amount of punishment already passed by her. The person was sentenced and accordingly the penalty was reduced.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Charsada lawyer
