GHULAM FAREED versus REGIONAL DIRECTOR, PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, BAHAWALPUR
Section 48 Rejects Appeal Against Delays Over Complaint Demand Effect Appellant / employee was relieved of their duties due to resignation, which was accepted by the competent authority and the employee was deemed to be retired. Complaint complaints filed by former employees were resigned from the application. The Labor Court Presiding Officer was dismissed on the basis of a constitutional petition filed by him more than two years after his retirement order was employed by the employer, after being dismissed, the employee employed his constitutional application. Two years after he was dismissed, he filed a complaint to the Labor Court. Delayed condolences, on the grounds that he was intentionally aggravating the matter before a wrong forum and it would be a good thing to delay filing a complaint request because the employee dispute was canceled because he Soon I was well aware of the illegal court order. After the death of the same employee, the employee filed the filed Con against the order of the court two years after the illegal application, with no convincing explanation, said that the delay was approved because of the appreciation of the law and the facts. The decree will not demand any interference in the appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Kharan lawyer