Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KOT ADDU


Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application against appeal order for receipt of Dover amount was fixed at 7 million for appeal court fee and jurisdiction for appeal before the High Court to correct. In accordance with Section 14 (1) (b) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, the appeal against a decision or order passed by the Family Court will lie before the District Judge, and where the Family Court presided. The District Judge or Additional District Judge or any officer of the same status shall then appear before the High Court under sub-section (a), which appeals against the Article, regarding the maximum value of the order for the purpose of appeal. There was no mention in section 14. Dwyer or dowry in excess of Rs 30,000 was not barred by section 14 (2) (b) of the Act

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Chak Sheza lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.