MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ versus ZAFAR IQBAL
A. XXIII, Rr 1 (3) and 2 (b), with the permission to file fresh suit on payment of costs, filing a fresh suit without payment of costs, before filing a legal suit or filing suit. Was required to submit costs at the time the fresh suit was to the plaintiff to deposit such amount. In the absence of payment of costs, there can be no appropriate case before the court, therefore, the new case will be dismissed as incompetent, only the technical competence of the procedure does not have to be prosecuted. In the interest of justice, the trial court may instruct the plaintiff to pay the actual costs, and even more specific costs for the exclusion on their part did not pass any such order if the trial court did not grant the plaintiff the original costs. Had it been directed to submit the costs, it would have been liable to dismiss the fresh case if the plaintiff had subsequently presented costs, complying with the order on his contrary failure.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Makran lawyer