MUHAMMAD ARIF versus THE STATE
Section 2302 (b) / evidence 34 The allegation of appreciating the evidence was not listed in the FIR when the complainant included the accused in his additional statement, even though the complainant's close relatives told him that the victim had The accused and his co-accused were not yet mentioned by the complainant in the FIR, which was filed in the company, which was filed after a delay of two days. No witnesses were available in the case. The victim's ass was not stained with a broom mini joint, the recovery of a knife was not acceptable in evidence, the prosecution's case was suspicious. He was full of arms, which had the benefit of going to the accused because the accused was acquitted in the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Killa Saifullah lawyer
