KAMRAN SALEEM versus SYED ARIF BOKHARI
Section 497 (2) of the Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22 bail, the only allegation against the accused in the FIR was that he allegedly complained to the complainant for employment abroad with the co-accused. The money was sought that there was no allegation that he had actually received some part of the money directly from the complainant in his statement under Section 161, the CCPC had said that the accused had taken him as a co-accused. It was not yet known whether the accused could be held responsible for the alleged crime. In the circumstances, further investigations into his crime were sought, which came under section (2) of 5 497, the PC suspect, who had been behind bars for the past four months, was on trial for extension of the former non-criminal bail. ? Excluded, the accused was admitted on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Badin lawyer