Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

KAMRAN SALEEM versus SYED ARIF BOKHARI


Section 497 (2) of the Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22 bail, the only allegation against the accused in the FIR was that he allegedly complained to the complainant for employment abroad with the co-accused. The money was sought that there was no allegation that he had actually received some part of the money directly from the complainant in his statement under Section 161, the CCPC had said that the accused had taken him as a co-accused. It was not yet known whether the accused could be held responsible for the alleged crime. In the circumstances, further investigations into his crime were sought, which came under section (2) of 5 497, the PC suspect, who had been behind bars for the past four months, was on trial for extension of the former non-criminal bail. ? Excluded, the accused was admitted on bail

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Badin lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.