THE STATE versus MUHAMMAD ARIF
Sections 406/420/468/471/218 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), S: 5 (2) of the West Pakistan Food Stuffs (Control) Act (XX of 1958), Section 3/6 of the Criminal Procedure Code. (V9 1898), section 1717T appeals against the trial without charge against the accused, dismissing them by saying that there was no evidence against them to link them to the crime. Because the record shows that there was direct evidence for the illicit use of five wheat trucks. Not only the complainant, but also the other witnesses, supported the prosecution's version that huge quantities of wheat were used illegally and was a serious matter, but the trial court acquitted the accused in a slip way and prosecuted. Asserted that the prosecution was not given the proper opportunity to present evidence. And to prosecute the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Darya Khan lawyer
