MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION SADDAR, MAILSI
Article 9 379 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition was cushing tenant of FLR Petitioner / accused and wheat applicant sown as tenant and allegedly without paying any share to the landowner. The crop was removed. Crop from where he allegedly took some crops R 378, PPC, under the circumstances, was not applicable and it cannot be said that the applicant was guilty of the offense under section 379, PPCF. The IR revealed that there was a dispute on its part. The case was to be filed between the landlord and the tenant for excise or recovery of value under the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, but not by criminal proceedings.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Jaranwala lawyer
