Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

CHIRAGH DIN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KHANEWAL


O XLI, R 27 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Production of Extra Evidence for Constitutional Petition The trial court allowed the preparation of additional evidence, but the appellate court accepted the amendment request and used its discretion properly. And the applicant failed to identify any jurisdiction. The appellate court ruled that the defect, instability or misconduct and stated that the party had no right to present additional evidence, but it was the court's discretion to decide on the facts and law of the matter. ? Should be sustained only if no jurisdictional error or injunction by the appellate court was against the law, in the event of non-maintenance of the constitutional petition, was excluded.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Muzaffarabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.