SHAHID SAYEED KHAN versus PRINZ (PVT.) LIMITED
O XXXVIII, R 5 Rule 5 of the Attachment O XXXVIII before the arrest, the CPC cited not the past, but the future, and the defendant, who with a particular intent was to dispose of the whole or part of his property. ? The case for the application of A. XXXVIII, R5, which transposes it after the institution of the suit after its application, shows the fact that the defendant did so after the institution of the suit. There can be strong evidence of intention, even if it is an asset. Left, but the transfer before the institution of the suit, after the institution of the suit, may be proof of intention
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Turbat lawyer
