ADEEL versus THE STATE
Section 9 (b) accused of defining evidence did not challenge the sentence on their merits, but requested reduction of sentence. Firstly, on the basis that he was not involved in any criminal case before. Secondly, on the basis that he had done the bulk of his sentence and finally on the basis that one of the accused was under the age of 18 at the time of his arrest, he was in jail since the date of his arrest. Was not on the record. His previous involvement and his further detention did not prove to be a worthwhile goal. The conviction was reduced to five years rigorous imprisonment, a term that has already passed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Liaquat Pur lawyer
