MUHAMMAD ALIAS MANDO MALLAH versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (b) bail, grant of further inquiry bail was primarily sought because the accused was not arrested on the spot. Nor was anything recovered from this person. To link it to the commission of the alleged crime, the defendant further claimed that despite receiving the information of the detective, no private person was named from the adviser, although it was reported that the incident occurred during the day in a town incident. It happened. According to this story, as stated in the FIR, it did not inspire confidence and demanded further investigation, considering the facts and circumstances of the case that the State Counsel acknowledged in favor of bail. The suspect was released on bail, under no circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Bahawalnagar lawyer