SHAHID MAHMOOD versus STATE
Section 497 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10, 13 and 14 bail, grants of three accomplices were already allowed to bail The accused against the accused was not committing adultery, but he was alleged As they were preparing the challan for the crime case had already been presented in the trial court, none of these women partner women were targeted for the Medico Legal Report because they did not give consent for the same accused. And she was not involved in any other criminal case that led to her being a dependent. It is wise that the homeowner and the accused will keep the doors open while they were charged with committing such a crime. No medical evidence was presented to support the prosecution's case. The accused was 20/22 years old and was not required. The accused needed for further investigation was admitted to bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Shakargarh lawyer