Section 171717 Appellate Code (XLV of 1850), section 382 Appeal against the acquittal incident The unexpected complainant / appellant stated that he had referred to Section H on several occasions, but his FI The R was not listed, however, acknowledging that no request was made to the top authorities about it. Section HA was held for not recording the FIR and it was submitted that only telegram section was sent to Section P and DC was directed directly by the complainant when it was more than 10 days. The trial of the alleged perpetrator of the aftermath is lacking in ocular testimony. The indictment was to extend the suspect to the dispute, between the evidence of the complainant and the prosecution's witnesses
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
