AZHAR HAYAT versus MALIK MUHAMMAD BASHIR, DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER EE/M, RAWALPINDI
Article 204 contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), section 3/4 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), section 5 (2) sanctions (XLV of 1860), provisions 420/468/471/467/109 The contempt of court, the special judge, anti-corruption, while advising the accused in this case and possibly not being aware of the prosecution, advised the department that under the rules of efficiency and discipline against the accused. The action should have been taken against which the department was prosecuted and eventually it dismissed the employees related to the criminal, the proceedings and the departmental proceedings were completely different, one related to the offender. While the implementation of the responsibility belonged to the discipline of service and disciplinary action had no effect on the criminal proceedings, such contempt was not a matter of law. The suit against the defendants was dismissed accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Rahwali lawyer
