CHINA PETROLEUM ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION versus KHATTAK ALLIED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Article 3 ((3) (d) Final Evidence of Fact Findings by Courts below the Recovery of Evidence) As a subcontractor to the claimant of the Supreme Court jurisdiction, he has fulfilled his contractual obligation. Claimed and despite the receipt claiming that the defendant did not pay the entire amount of the project, the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff and the trial court The order passed by the plaintiff had maintained by the High Court that the plaintiff had failed to complete its work. The plaintiff's plaintiff had substantiated his claim by presenting controversial and concrete oral evidence that was supported by various documents that could not be denied by the defendant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
