AFSAR ALI KHAN versus SHERIN GUL
Sections 6 and 13 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Termination of Trial for Section 115 Trials Both the trial court and the appellate court dismissed the case below. The plaintiffs together with the courts in review before the High Court. Challenged the subsequent decisions that these decisions were contradictory and that the orders were contrary to law and facts and that the results of the two courts below on the question of `students of 'were not based on proper definition of evidence by justification. In view of the apparent contradictions and contradictions in the statements of the witnesses presented, the courts below argued. There are legitimate reasons for dismissing them and concluding that under Section 13 of the North-West Frontier Province Pre-British Act, 1987, which satisfies the requirement of `students' was not satisfactorily proven. That both were in evidence of the court's finding. No material piece of record or evidence was neglected or excluded
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Khanqah Dogran lawyer