KHUSHI MUHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERS versus JANNAT BIBI
Section 42 Case filed for Plaintiff's declaration filed by Plaintiff's Woman and Permanent Removal, in which she claimed to have forged in favor of the Defendants because the trial court against them The preferred appeal was heard by the defendants. He said that the order was dismissed that the plaintiff's argument was that the defendants had failed to bar the sale of the alleged sale, payment of the transaction or transfer of possession and since the plaintiff was an uneducated witness, Therefore, the defendant failed to prove that the affirmative evidence, the transaction in his favor, stood in an active sincere relationship with the claimant of the jurisdiction and, after the plaintiff denied the transaction, no doubt, the bargaining and sale transaction. It was necessary to prove this through positive evidence beyond religion, but he failed to do so
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Kahror Pacca lawyer