RUSTAM ALI AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE
Section 302/34 Testimony Testimony The benefit of the doubt was closely related to the prosecution's witnesses, and both of the prosecution witnesses for the victim were witnesses of the occasion because they were not located at the location of the incident, but were residents of other locations from afar. Were. Two to three kilometers from the location of the incident and at the relevant time he could not explain his presence on the spot and stated that it is not safe to rely on the testimony of witnesses, five days into filing an FIR. The delay was unknown, which was fatal. The prosecution's case stated that the extraordinary delay showed that it was an unexpected event and that the culprits were not aware and that the complaining party was in talks to nominate someone in such case. The delay is the reality of the story.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Bhalwal lawyer