Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS versus SH. GUL MUHAMMAD

A. XXXVII was based on checks 1 and 2 for the collection of money which was allegedly issued by the defendants but was not honored by the bank defenders who were allowed leave in defense and competition suit. He was told that the payment was made by him and that the claim based on the checks was false and irrelevant and the claimant did not return this check in response to which the claimant's reply was put before him. The answer to the questions was straightforward and natural and enough to prove his receipt was money but he tried to add a proviso through the explanation that his RA is caused by some other payment arrears law websites from Sangla Hill lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes